CMTFX vs. FELIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX).
CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000. FELIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -10.17% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
FELIX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I | 0.34% | 45.25% | 44.10% | 75.49% | -34.88% | 57.89% | 44.02% | 64.21% | -12.52% | 34.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMTFX achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than FELIX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CMTFX has underperformed FELIX with an annualized return of 20.54%, while FELIX has yielded a comparatively higher 29.99% annualized return.
CMTFX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
FELIX
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 77.58%
- 3Y*
- 38.40%
- 5Y*
- 28.12%
- 10Y*
- 29.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMTFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FELIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMTFX vs. FELIX — Risk / Return Rank
CMTFX
FELIX
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMTFX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.94 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 2.55 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 4.18 | -2.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 15.94 | -9.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMTFX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.94 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.75 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMTFX and FELIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Dividend Comparison
CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than FELIX's 6.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.44% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
FELIX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I | 6.49% | 6.51% | 6.44% | 3.15% | 3.09% | 4.14% | 4.43% | 1.04% | 19.34% | 9.50% | 0.55% | 10.37% |
Drawdowns
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMTFX drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FELIX drawdown of -71.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMTFX and FELIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMTFX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -71.17% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -17.09% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.42% | -46.02% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.42% | -46.02% | +6.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.35% | -14.65% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -21.27% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 4.49% | -0.45% |
Volatility
CMTFX vs. FELIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) is 7.45%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that CMTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMTFX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 10.51% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 24.76% | -8.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 39.67% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 37.96% | -12.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 34.34% | -9.68% |