CMSA vs. ACI
CMSA (CMS Energy Corporation) and ACI (Albertsons Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. Over the past 5 years, CMSA returned 0.69%/yr vs -4.01%/yr for ACI. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CMSA vs. ACI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMSA achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than ACI's -30.23% return.
CMSA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 1.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.43%
ACI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -16.81%
- 6M
- -28.68%
- YTD
- -30.23%
- 1Y
- -38.43%
- 3Y*
- -16.54%
- 5Y*
- -4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $167.00M | $127.10M | $117.31M | |
| $303.00K | $309.91K | $327.79K |
CMSA vs. ACI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMSA CMS Energy Corporation | -1.78% | 4.82% | -3.74% | 19.69% | -12.73% | -2.19% | 13.14% |
ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | -30.23% | -9.96% | -12.54% | 13.42% | -6.81% | 75.18% | 14.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMSA and ACI is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
CMSA:
$22.74B
ACI:
$5.67B
CMSA:
$3.41
ACI:
$0.16
CMSA:
6.12
ACI:
71.13
CMSA:
0.71
ACI:
0.06
CMSA:
$8.81B
ACI:
$83.23B
CMSA:
$6.14B
ACI:
$22.08B
CMSA:
$3.12B
ACI:
$3.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMSA vs. ACI — Risk / Return Rank
CMSA
ACI
CMSA vs. ACI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMSA) and Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMSA | ACI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.81 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.89 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | -2.46 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMSA vs. ACI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMSA drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, smaller than the maximum ACI drawdown of -54.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMSA and ACI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMSA | ACI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -54.64% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -42.10% | +30.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.75% | -49.09% | +33.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.64% | -54.64% | +38.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -52.38% | +41.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -19.12% | +14.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 15.16% | -7.98% |
Volatility
CMSA vs. ACI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CMS Energy Corporation (CMSA) is 1.60%, while Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) has a volatility of 26.50%. This indicates that CMSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMSA | ACI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 26.50% | -24.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 33.54% | -28.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.25% | 37.74% | -29.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.45% | 32.08% | -20.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 32.62% | -16.21% |
Dividends
CMSA vs. ACI - Dividend Comparison
CMSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than ACI's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 5.53% | 3.49% | 2.44% | 2.09% | 35.34% | 1.39% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMSA CMS Energy Corporation | 6.73% | 6.41% | 6.30% | 5.74% | 6.46% | 5.32% | 4.94% | 5.37% | 2.97% |
Financials
CMSA vs. ACI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and Albertsons Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMSA vs. ACI - Profitability Comparison
CMSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.
ACI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.64B and revenue of 24.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
CMSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 264.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
ACI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 263.60M and revenue of 24.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
CMSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 120.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
ACI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 84.70M and revenue of 24.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMSA and ACI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACI has higher volatility (26.50%) compared to CMSA (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMSA dropped -32.26% vs ACI's -54.64%.
CMSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMSA and ACI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer