PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMR.TO achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than XAW.TO's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CMR.TO has underperformed XAW.TO with an annualized return of 1.89%, while XAW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.


CMR.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.05%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
1.89%

XAW.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.13%
YTD
13.70%
6M
12.70%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
0.97%2.68%4.70%4.70%1.71%0.00%0.47%1.63%1.29%0.63%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
13.70%15.87%26.31%18.45%-11.84%18.38%12.37%19.82%-2.28%16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CMR.TO and XAW.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMR.TO
CMR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CMR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMR.TOXAW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+17.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.57

1.48

+8.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.44

3.76

+21.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

187.33

15.15

+172.17

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.61, which is higher than the XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMR.TO and XAW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMR.TOXAW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.61

2.50

+8.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

10.67

1.04

+9.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

7.02

0.88

+6.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.84

0.78

+3.06

Drawdowns

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMR.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum XAW.TO drawdown of -27.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMR.TO and XAW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMR.TOXAW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-27.32%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.09%

-8.16%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.09%

-16.66%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-21.02%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.14%

-27.32%

+27.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.37%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-3.91%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.02%

-2.01%

Volatility

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) is 0.05%, while iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that CMR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMR.TOXAW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

4.21%

-4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.18%

9.85%

-9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

12.25%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.28%

13.56%

-13.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.27%

15.12%

-14.85%

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMR.TO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XAW.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMR.TO vs. XAW.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than XAW.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
2.48%2.81%4.56%4.64%1.62%0.00%0.47%1.60%1.33%0.61%0.43%0.48%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.17%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMR.TO and XAW.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XAW.TO.

CMR.TO is categorized as Money Market, while XAW.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CMR.TO and 0.22% for XAW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMR.TO and XAW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer