CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO
CMR.TO (iShares Premium Money Market ETF) and GCNS.TO (iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - CMR.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by iShares, while GCNS.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMR.TO returned 2.94%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for GCNS.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMR.TO charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GCNS.TO.
Performance
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMR.TO achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than GCNS.TO's 6.84% return.
CMR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 2.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
GCNS.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 13.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMR.TO iShares Premium Money Market ETF | 0.97% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.70% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCNS.TO iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 6.84% | 7.23% | 15.54% | 11.66% | -10.94% | 8.07% | 4.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMR.TO and GCNS.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMR.TO
GCNS.TO
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) and iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMR.TO | GCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +18.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.57 | 1.35 | +8.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.44 | 2.80 | +22.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 187.33 | 9.32 | +178.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMR.TO | GCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.61 | 1.59 | +9.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 10.67 | 0.85 | +9.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 7.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.84 | 0.92 | +2.92 |
Drawdowns
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMR.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum GCNS.TO drawdown of -15.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMR.TO and GCNS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMR.TO | GCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -15.37% | +14.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.09% | -4.81% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.09% | -7.38% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.09% | -15.37% | +15.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -3.56% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 1.44% | -1.43% |
Volatility
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) is 0.05%, while iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that CMR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMR.TO | GCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 2.47% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.18% | 5.59% | -5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 8.49% | -8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 8.20% | -7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.27% | 7.83% | -7.56% |
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMR.TO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GCNS.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CMR.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CMR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than GCNS.TO's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMR.TO iShares Premium Money Market ETF | 2.48% | 2.81% | 4.56% | 4.64% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.61% | 0.43% | 0.48% |
GCNS.TO iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 1.98% | 2.07% | 2.03% | 2.88% | 2.09% | 1.60% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMR.TO and GCNS.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GCNS.TO.
CMR.TO is categorized as Money Market, while GCNS.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CMR.TO and 0.25% for GCNS.TO.
Find the right allocation for CMR.TO and GCNS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer