CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CMOP.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc) and SBEM.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - CMOP.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while SBEM.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMOP.L returned 10.87%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for SBEM.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMOP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for SBEM.L.

Performance

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMOP.L achieves a 19.51% return, which is significantly higher than SBEM.L's 2.82% return.

CMOP.L

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -7.51%
• YTD: 19.51%
• 6M: 20.29%
• 1Y: 29.45%
• 3Y*: 11.03%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: —

SBEM.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 2.82%
• 6M: 3.45%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 9.07%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 4.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc	19.51%	8.23%	6.01%	-12.72%	28.44%	28.71%	-7.11%	1.37%	-3.26%	-24.46%
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.82%	7.42%	9.45%	5.95%	-10.24%	-1.29%	1.29%	10.91%	1.42%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CMOP.L and SBEM.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017	0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between CMOP.L and SBEM.L has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMOP.L

CMOP.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
CMOP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CMOP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CMOP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CMOP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CMOP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SBEM.L

SBEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SBEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SBEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SBEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SBEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMOP.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.24	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.28	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	4.05	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	11.69	-2.83

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMOP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMOP.L and SBEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMOP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, which is greater than SBEM.L's maximum drawdown of -21.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOP.L and SBEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMOP.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.21%	-21.61%	-22.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-3.53%	-5.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.87%	-9.79%	-17.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.78%	-17.20%	-11.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.03%	0.00%	-9.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.89%	-7.22%	-14.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	1.23%	+2.30%

Volatility

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) at 1.48%. This indicates that CMOP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMOP.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	1.48%	+3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.30%	4.51%	+11.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.62%	6.40%	+12.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.30%	9.13%	+12.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	10.97%	+8.05%

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMOP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SBEM.L's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMOP.L vs. SBEM.L - Dividend Comparison

CMOP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	6.51%	7.69%	6.27%	6.49%	5.73%	4.35%	4.92%	4.83%	4.47%	4.84%	2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMOP.L and SBEM.L in my portfolio?

CMOP.L and SBEM.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMOP.L or SBEM.L?

On fees, CMOP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMOP.L or SBEM.L?

CMOP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SBEM.L.

What is the main difference between CMOP.L and SBEM.L?

CMOP.L is categorized as Commodities, while SBEM.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. CMOP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while SBEM.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CMOP.L and 0.42% for SBEM.L.