CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE).
CMOE.DE and ETL2.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMOE.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Aug 16, 2018. ETL2.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Mar 15, 2010. Both CMOE.DE and ETL2.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMOE.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 20.03% | 14.96% | 2.92% | -9.62% | -0.48% |
ETL2.DE L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 14.02% | 4.89% | 11.54% | -9.44% | 12.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMOE.DE achieves a 20.03% return, which is significantly higher than ETL2.DE's 14.02% return.
CMOE.DE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 6M
- 29.11%
- 1Y
- 27.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETL2.DE
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMOE.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ETL2.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CMOE.DE
ETL2.DE
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMOE.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 0.87 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 1.21 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.17 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 1.76 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 3.67 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMOE.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.87 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.24 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMOE.DE and ETL2.DE is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMOE.DE nor ETL2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMOE.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum ETL2.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOE.DE and ETL2.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMOE.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -47.04% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.37% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -3.68% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -22.11% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.78% | -0.40% |
Volatility
CMOE.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) at 6.33%. This indicates that CMOE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETL2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMOE.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 6.33% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 11.73% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 15.31% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 15.31% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 13.65% | +2.73% |