CMNWX vs. RCKSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX).
CMNWX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Nov 24, 1986. RCKSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 31, 2004.
Performance
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | -6.68% | 13.27% | 32.14% | 25.01% | -16.37% | 27.45% | 18.36% | 32.21% | -4.12% | 20.64% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 6.05% | 12.99% | 15.12% | 15.57% | -18.09% | 9.96% | 13.75% | 19.05% | -2.14% | 22.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 13.74%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.
CMNWX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.74%
RCKSX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMNWX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank
CMNWX
RCKSX
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMNWX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.33 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.96 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.76 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 9.21 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMNWX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.33 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.38 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.58 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.36 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMNWX and RCKSX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison
CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than RCKSX's 5.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | 9.38% | 8.75% | 10.03% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 9.52% | 5.33% | 8.37% | 46.60% | 7.72% | 10.32% | 5.42% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 5.90% | 6.26% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 4.31% | 16.56% | 3.18% | 0.59% | 5.91% | 0.70% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and RCKSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMNWX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -57.88% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -11.29% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -23.50% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.26% | -33.10% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.91% | -3.25% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -9.58% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.15% | +0.26% |
Volatility
CMNWX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.42%. This indicates that CMNWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMNWX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.42% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 8.76% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 16.37% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 15.77% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 17.58% | -0.44% |