CMNWX vs. PFUMX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) and PFUMX (Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal, while PFUMX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Principal. Over the past 5 years, CMNWX returned 14.63%/yr vs 4.41%/yr for PFUMX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMNWX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for PFUMX.

Performance

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than PFUMX's 2.32% return.

CMNWX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 10.54%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 23.40%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: 15.46%

PFUMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 12.60%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	10.54%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	19.73%
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund	2.32%	16.05%	7.41%	11.21%	-9.30%	-2.99%	7.84%	14.75%	-1.61%	11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNWX and PFUMX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.31

The correlation between CMNWX and PFUMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CMNWX vs. PFUMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PFUMX

PFUMX Risk / Return Rank: 80
PFUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PFUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PFUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PFUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PFUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMNWX	PFUMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	3.46	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	5.08	-2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.80	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	2.93	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.23	10.44	+2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the PFUMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNWX and PFUMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMNWX	PFUMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	3.46	-1.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.86	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.21	-0.50

Drawdowns

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than PFUMX's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and PFUMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMNWX	PFUMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.43%	-21.27%	-29.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-4.45%	-4.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.54%	-6.79%	-12.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-21.27%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-1.09%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.95%	-3.29%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.25%	+0.65%

Volatility

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) at 0.90%. This indicates that CMNWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFUMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMNWX	PFUMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	0.90%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	3.13%	+6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	3.77%	+8.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	5.15%	+11.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	4.72%	+12.46%

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PFUMX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMNWX vs. PFUMX - Dividend Comparison

CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than PFUMX's 5.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	7.92%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund	5.53%	5.89%	7.26%	6.43%	7.99%	2.98%	4.29%	5.43%	3.84%	7.86%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMNWX and PFUMX in my portfolio?

CMNWX and PFUMX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMNWX or PFUMX?

CMNWX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PFUMX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs PFUMX's -21.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.