CMNIX vs. CNWIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CMNIX (Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class) and CNWIX (Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - CMNIX is a fund fund managed by Calamos, while CNWIX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Calamos. Over the past 10 years, CMNIX returned 4.79%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for CNWIX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMNIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CNWIX.

Performance

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNIX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 51.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNIX has underperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 4.79%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.

CMNIX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 6.94%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 4.84%
• 10Y*: 4.79%

CNWIX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 51.09%
• 6M: 54.41%
• 1Y: 72.44%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMNIX Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class	2.86%	6.89%	7.43%	9.17%	-4.26%	5.02%	5.36%	6.72%	1.79%	4.21%
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	51.09%	19.29%	14.99%	6.60%	-24.35%	-4.70%	54.23%	20.76%	-17.74%	36.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNIX and CNWIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2008	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between CMNIX and CNWIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CMNIX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNIX

CMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
CMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CNWIX

CNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
CNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMNIX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.91	3.17	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.31	3.79	+2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.02	1.57	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.99	4.48	+2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.93	16.56	+26.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is comparable to the CNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNIX and CNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMNIX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91	3.17	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.40	0.49	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.33	0.51	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.36	+0.01

Drawdowns

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNIX drawdown since its inception was -35.16%, smaller than the maximum CNWIX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNIX and CNWIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMNIX	CNWIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.16%	-43.57%	+8.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.02%	-16.28%	+15.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.77%	-19.34%	+16.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.52%	-37.36%	+29.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.12%	-43.57%	+35.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	0.00%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.16%	-16.43%	+9.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	4.39%	-4.22%

Volatility

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX) is 0.33%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that CMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMNIX	CNWIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	10.53%	-10.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.52%	20.15%	-18.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82%	22.99%	-21.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.47%	18.45%	-14.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.62%	24.47%	-20.85%

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMNIX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison

CMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than CNWIX's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNIX Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class	1.70%	1.63%	2.00%	5.90%	1.02%	0.46%	0.90%	1.57%	5.02%	2.60%	2.97%	2.42%
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	0.04%	0.06%	0.00%	0.54%	0.97%	2.79%	2.01%	1.04%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMNIX and CNWIX in my portfolio?

CMNIX and CNWIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMNIX or CNWIX?

CNWIX has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to CMNIX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNIX dropped -35.16% vs CNWIX's -43.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.