CMJAX vs. ATGAX
CMJAX (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CMJAX charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CMJAX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CMJAX Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A | 1.80% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMJAX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMJAX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
CMJAX
ATGAX
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMJAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMJAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 58.33 | -57.72 |
Drawdowns
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMJAX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMJAX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMJAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | 0.00% | -38.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | 0.00% | -6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMJAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 9.26% | +4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 9.26% | +9.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 9.26% | +10.32% |
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMJAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMJAX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
CMJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMJAX Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A | 3.82% | 4.40% | 0.89% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 2.64% | 2.43% | 1.57% | 2.97% | 2.81% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CMJAX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for CMJAX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer