CMGG vs. NTSD
CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
CMGG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CMGG
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -25.63%
- YTD
- -47.85%
- 6M
- -39.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMGG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | -30.53% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG and NTSD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 5.46 | -6.08 |
Drawdowns
CMGG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.75% | -5.20% | -51.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.75% | -0.04% | -56.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -0.83% | -20.51% |
Volatility
CMGG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.82% | 24.10% | +42.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.82% | 24.10% | +42.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.82% | 24.10% | +42.72% |
CMGG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMGG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGG and NTSD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CMGG.
CMGG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for CMGG and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer