CMGG vs. DBO
CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CMGG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. CMGG is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
CMGG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGG achieves a -45.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
CMGG
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -20.45%
- YTD
- -45.23%
- 6M
- -35.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
CMGG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | -45.23% | 43.86% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG and DBO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG
DBO
CMGG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.02 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
CMGG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -54.58%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.58% | -90.18% | +35.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.58% | -51.38% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.08% | -62.25% | +41.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.92% | — |
Volatility
CMGG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.76% | 34.46% | +32.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.76% | 32.29% | +34.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.76% | 31.78% | +34.98% |
CMGG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGG and DBO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for CMGG.
CMGG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for CMGG and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer