CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

CMDO.TO (CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund) and ZHY.TO (BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMDO.TO is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management, while ZHY.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Very Liquid Index CAD Hedged. CMDO.TO is actively managed, while ZHY.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CMDO.TO returned 5.51%/yr vs 6.27%/yr for ZHY.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMDO.TO charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZHY.TO.

Performance

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) and BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDO.TO achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than ZHY.TO's 0.42% return.

CMDO.TO

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 0.97%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.44%

ZHY.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: -0.12%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 3.48%
• ALL TIME*: 4.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CMDO.TO CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund	CA$15.20K	CA$29.38K	CA$28.11K
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF	CA$244.38K	CA$275.05K	CA$293.70K

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CMDO.TO CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund	1.93%	7.40%	3.86%	5.89%	-2.66%	0.80%
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF	0.42%	6.27%	6.04%	11.48%	-12.79%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CMDO.TO and ZHY.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021	0.24

Return for Risk

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDO.TO

CMDO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
CMDO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CMDO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CMDO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CMDO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CMDO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

ZHY.TO

ZHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 27
ZHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ZHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ZHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ZHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ZHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) and BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMDO.TO	ZHY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.53	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.79	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.10	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	0.95	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	3.52	+8.72

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMDO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the ZHY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDO.TO and ZHY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDO.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.85%, smaller than the maximum ZHY.TO drawdown of -28.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDO.TO and ZHY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMDO.TO	ZHY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-28.44%	+21.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.54%	-2.96%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.41%	-5.65%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-1.46%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-2.85%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.39%	0.80%	-0.41%

Volatility

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) at 0.94%. This indicates that CMDO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMDO.TO	ZHY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	0.94%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	4.24%	-1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	5.31%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.06%	9.54%	-3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.06%	10.86%	-4.80%

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDO.TO has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHY.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMDO.TO vs. ZHY.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMDO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than ZHY.TO's 6.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMDO.TO CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund	3.84%	3.84%	3.97%	3.96%	2.15%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF	6.46%	6.10%	6.13%	6.43%	6.71%	5.49%	6.09%	6.50%	6.25%	6.10%	5.84%	7.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMDO.TO and ZHY.TO in my portfolio?

CMDO.TO and ZHY.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMDO.TO or ZHY.TO?

On fees, ZHY.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMDO.TO or ZHY.TO?

ZHY.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for CMDO.TO.

What is the main difference between CMDO.TO and ZHY.TO?

CMDO.TO is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while ZHY.TO is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for CMDO.TO and 0.61% for ZHY.TO.