CMCX.L vs. TUSK
CMCX.L (CMC Markets plc) and TUSK (Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.) are both stocks. CMCX.L operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while TUSK operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CMCX.L returned 3.69%/yr vs -2.14%/yr for TUSK. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMCX.L is traded in GBp, while TUSK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TUSK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCX.L achieves a 55.18% return, which is significantly lower than TUSK's 78.75% return.
CMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 22.43%
- YTD
- 55.18%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 93.05%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
TUSK
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 78.75%
- 6M
- 85.42%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- -12.50%
- 5Y*
- -2.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 55.18% | 27.16% | 144.09% | -51.43% | -10.97% | -28.25% | 183.92% | 43.23% | -26.78% | 45.42% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 78.75% | -42.73% | -31.56% | -51.02% | 431.79% | -58.71% | 96.33% | -88.06% | -2.19% | 17.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCX.L and TUSK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016 | 0.00 |
Fundamentals
CMCX.L:
£1.30B
TUSK:
$159.01M
CMCX.L:
£0.50
TUSK:
-$1.47
CMCX.L:
1.69
TUSK:
2.54
CMCX.L:
2.84
TUSK:
0.60
CMCX.L:
£755.33M
TUSK:
$62.70M
CMCX.L:
£533.42M
TUSK:
$9.65M
CMCX.L:
£232.99M
TUSK:
-$14.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCX.L vs. TUSK — Risk / Return Rank
CMCX.L
TUSK
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMCX.L | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.12 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 0.47 | +4.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.26 | 0.85 | +12.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -81.04%, smaller than the maximum TUSK drawdown of -98.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCX.L and TUSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCX.L | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.04% | -98.51% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -41.54% | +24.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.29% | -70.78% | +25.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.60% | -81.92% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -91.91% | +91.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -73.17% | +32.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 22.78% | -16.15% |
Volatility
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) is 17.61%, while Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) has a volatility of 22.21%. This indicates that CMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCX.L | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.61% | 22.21% | -4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.26% | 55.48% | -31.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 66.87% | -24.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 72.25% | -25.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.35% | 86.81% | -40.46% |
Dividends
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Dividend Comparison
CMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while TUSK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 2.97% | 4.62% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 5.53% | 9.46% | 5.47% | 2.41% | 6.94% | 5.95% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.36% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Financials
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMC Markets plc and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMCX.L vs. TUSK - Profitability Comparison
CMCX.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a gross profit of 188.08M and revenue of 217.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.
TUSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.78M and revenue of 22.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.
CMCX.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported an operating income of 57.64M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.
TUSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
CMCX.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a net income of 38.42M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
TUSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.19M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCX.L and TUSK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMCX.L and TUSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer