CMBT vs. PSTG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG).

Performance

CMBT vs. PSTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMBT vs. PSTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	31.76%	-2.30%	-35.19%	17.73%	93.21%	12.61%	-24.34%	83.37%	-24.03%	20.60%
PSTG Pure Storage, Inc.	-11.89%	9.08%	72.27%	33.26%	-17.79%	43.96%	32.14%	6.41%	1.39%	40.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CMBT : $3.67B PSTG : $20.43B
EPS CMBT : $0.67 PSTG : $0.56
PE Ratio CMBT : 18.75 PSTG : 105.96
PEG Ratio CMBT : 0.43 PSTG : 3.28
PS Ratio CMBT : 1.82 PSTG : 5.44
PB Ratio CMBT : 1.40 PSTG : 14.13
Total Revenue (TTM) CMBT : $1.67B PSTG : $3.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) CMBT : $593.32M PSTG : $2.58B
EBITDA (TTM) CMBT : $924.65M PSTG : $313.25M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBT achieves a 31.76% return, which is significantly higher than PSTG's -11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CMBT has underperformed PSTG with an annualized return of 9.57%, while PSTG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.

CMBT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -14.58%
• YTD: 31.76%
• 6M: 36.14%
• 1Y: 40.79%
• 3Y*: -0.16%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

PSTG

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -8.07%
• YTD: -11.89%
• 6M: -29.55%
• 1Y: 33.36%
• 3Y*: 32.28%
• 5Y*: 21.86%
• 10Y*: 15.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMBT vs. PSTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBT

CMBT Risk / Return Rank: 72
CMBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CMBT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CMBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CMBT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PSTG

PSTG Risk / Return Rank: 60
PSTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PSTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PSTG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PSTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PSTG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBT vs. PSTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMBT	PSTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.50	+0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.15	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.17	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	0.67	+1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.93	1.53	+3.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMBT vs. PSTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the PSTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMBT and PSTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMBT	PSTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	0.50	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.43	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.30	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.26	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between CMBT and PSTG is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMBT vs. PSTG - Dividend Comparison

CMBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while PSTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	0.79%	0.52%	25.18%	12.23%	0.70%	1.35%	20.75%	0.96%	1.73%	3.03%	17.23%	6.35%
PSTG Pure Storage, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CMBT vs. PSTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBT drawdown since its inception was -57.21%, smaller than the maximum PSTG drawdown of -69.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBT and PSTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMBT	PSTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.21%	-69.43%	+12.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.70%	-42.26%	+22.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.21%	-48.63%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.21%	-69.43%	+12.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.41%	-40.18%	+9.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.31%	-24.42%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.02%	18.47%	-10.45%

Volatility

CMBT vs. PSTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) is 12.29%, while Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that CMBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMBT	PSTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	13.55%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.91%	50.06%	-22.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.87%	66.85%	-23.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.58%	51.26%	-8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	50.67%	-9.81%

Financials

CMBT vs. PSTG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cmb.Tech NV and Pure Storage, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CMBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported a gross profit of 216.12M and revenue of 594.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

PSTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Storage, Inc. reported a gross profit of 740.09M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.9%.

CMBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported an operating income of 160.73M and revenue of 594.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.

PSTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Storage, Inc. reported an operating income of 102.37M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

CMBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported a net income of 90.88M and revenue of 594.48M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

PSTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Storage, Inc. reported a net income of 100.25M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.