CMBS vs. EVMO
CMBS (iShares CMBS ETF) and EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. CMBS is passively managed, while EVMO is actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMBS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EVMO.
Performance
CMBS vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMBS achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than EVMO's 0.83% return.
CMBS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
EVMO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMBS vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 0.49% | 2.05% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.83% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBS and EVMO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMBS vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank
CMBS
EVMO
CMBS vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMBS | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMBS | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.79 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
CMBS vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBS drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, which is greater than EVMO's maximum drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBS and EVMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBS | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -1.89% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.81% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -0.39% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
CMBS vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMBS | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 2.82% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 2.82% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 2.82% | +2.95% |
CMBS vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMBS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMBS vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison
CMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than EVMO's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.57% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.07% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMBS and EVMO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMBS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMBS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.
EVMO has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.57% for CMBS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CMBS and 0.45% for EVMO.
Find the right allocation for CMBS and EVMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer