PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMBS vs. EVMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMBS vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMBS vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
0.07%2.05%
EVMO
Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF
0.38%3.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBS achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than EVMO's 0.38% return.


CMBS

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
0.07%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
2.18%

EVMO

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
0.38%
6M
2.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMBS vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMBS vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBS
CMBS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

EVMO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBS vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMBSEVMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.26

CMBS vs. EVMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMBSEVMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

2.06

-1.62

Correlation

The correlation between CMBS and EVMO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CMBS vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison

CMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than EVMO's 3.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
3.53%3.45%3.31%2.97%2.65%2.46%2.83%2.74%2.70%2.50%2.29%2.31%
EVMO
Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF
3.17%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMBS vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBS drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, which is greater than EVMO's maximum drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBS and EVMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMBSEVMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.87%

-1.89%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.26%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-0.25%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

Volatility

CMBS vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMBSEVMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

2.78%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

2.78%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

2.78%

+2.99%