CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO
CMAR.TO (CI Marret Alternative Absolute Return Bond Fund) and CAGS.TO (CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMAR.TO is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by CI, while CAGS.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by CI. Over the past 5 years, CMAR.TO returned 1.34%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for CAGS.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMAR.TO achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than CAGS.TO's 1.19% return.
CMAR.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.17%
CAGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.33%
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMAR.TO CI Marret Alternative Absolute Return Bond Fund | 1.73% | 4.98% | 3.37% | 5.33% | -8.32% | 0.98% | 6.73% |
CAGS.TO CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.19% | 3.95% | 6.07% | 5.02% | -4.30% | -1.22% | 3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMAR.TO and CAGS.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2020 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMAR.TO
CAGS.TO
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Marret Alternative Absolute Return Bond Fund (CMAR.TO) and CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMAR.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.45 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | 7.38 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMAR.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CAGS.TO drawdown of -11.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMAR.TO and CAGS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMAR.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -11.60% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -1.33% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.60% | -1.33% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.07% | -7.58% | -4.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.27% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -1.45% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.44% | +0.05% |
Volatility
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Marret Alternative Absolute Return Bond Fund (CMAR.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGS.TO) at 0.68%. This indicates that CMAR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMAR.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 0.68% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 1.62% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 2.06% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 2.76% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 4.62% | +0.74% |
Dividends
CMAR.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CMAR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than CAGS.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGS.TO CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.16% | 3.37% | 2.62% | 2.61% | 1.96% | 2.59% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 1.06% |
CMAR.TO CI Marret Alternative Absolute Return Bond Fund | 4.44% | 4.42% | 4.44% | 4.39% | 3.49% | 2.93% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMAR.TO and CAGS.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMAR.TO is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CAGS.TO is Short-Term Bond.
Find the right allocation for CMAR.TO and CAGS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer