CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO
CM.TO (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) is a stock, while VBAL.TO (Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio) is Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Vanguard. Over the past 5 years, CM.TO returned 23.85%/yr vs 7.73%/yr for VBAL.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM.TO achieves a 28.60% return, which is significantly higher than VBAL.TO's 7.94% return.
CM.TO
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 6M
- 26.24%
- 1Y
- 77.57%
- 3Y*
- 47.25%
- 5Y*
- 23.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
VBAL.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 28.60% | 42.31% | 49.56% | 23.83% | -20.89% | 47.75% | 13.88% | 18.19% | -8.13% |
VBAL.TO Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio | 7.94% | 11.92% | 14.62% | 12.49% | -11.39% | 10.21% | 10.27% | 14.90% | -3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM.TO and VBAL.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CM.TO and VBAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CM.TO
VBAL.TO
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CM.TO | VBAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.40 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.50 | 2.95 | +5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.13 | 12.36 | +18.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.49%, which is greater than VBAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM.TO and VBAL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM.TO | VBAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.49% | -21.19% | -37.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -5.93% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -9.66% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.43% | -16.38% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.50% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -3.14% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 1.42% | +1.06% |
Volatility
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) at 3.41%. This indicates that CM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM.TO | VBAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 3.41% | +4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 7.00% | +7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 8.33% | +9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 8.70% | +9.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 10.11% | +9.81% |
Dividends
CM.TO vs. VBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than VBAL.TO's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.57% | 3.20% | 4.04% | 5.47% | 7.52% | 8.13% | 10.74% | 10.51% | 10.58% | 8.39% | 8.84% | 9.69% |
VBAL.TO Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.07% | 2.23% | 2.30% | 2.37% | 2.21% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CM.TO and VBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CM.TO and VBAL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer