CM.TO vs. PLTR
CM.TO (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. CM.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, CM.TO returned 23.85%/yr vs 43.07%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CM.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM.TO achieves a 28.60% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -26.53% return.
CM.TO
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 6M
- 26.24%
- 1Y
- 77.57%
- 3Y*
- 47.25%
- 5Y*
- 23.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -26.53%
- 6M
- -29.28%
- 1Y
- -4.27%
- 3Y*
- 102.99%
- 5Y*
- 43.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 28.60% | 42.31% | 49.56% | 23.83% | -20.89% | 47.75% | 11.71% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -26.53% | 124.30% | 377.77% | 161.08% | -62.51% | -22.71% | 124.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM.TO and PLTR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
CM.TO:
CA$146.70B
PLTR:
$329.05B
CM.TO:
CA$10.53
PLTR:
$0.89
CM.TO:
15.07
PLTR:
144.03
CM.TO:
1.85
PLTR:
0.84
CM.TO:
2.78
PLTR:
62.90
CM.TO:
2.51
PLTR:
38.94
CM.TO:
CA$53.25B
PLTR:
$5.22B
CM.TO:
CA$28.73B
PLTR:
$4.39B
CM.TO:
CA$13.01B
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM.TO vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
CM.TO
PLTR
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CM.TO | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.03 | +0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.50 | -0.08 | +8.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.13 | -0.15 | +31.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.49%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM.TO and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM.TO | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.49% | -83.57% | +25.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -39.63% | +30.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -41.05% | +24.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.43% | -77.89% | +42.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -38.41% | +37.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -39.52% | +30.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 22.11% | -19.63% |
Volatility
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) is 7.93%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 16.93%. This indicates that CM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM.TO | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 16.93% | -9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 38.57% | -23.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 50.96% | -33.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 65.41% | -47.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 69.83% | -49.91% |
Dividends
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
CM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.57% | 3.20% | 4.04% | 5.47% | 7.52% | 8.13% | 10.74% | 10.51% | 10.58% | 8.39% | 8.84% | 9.69% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CM.TO vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
CM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
CM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
CM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CM.TO and PLTR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CM.TO and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer