CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO).

CLSA.TO is an actively managed fund by Brompton Funds. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	-2.42%	56.35%
DFN.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp.	0.09%	56.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSA.TO achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than DFN.TO's 0.09% return.

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 53.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFN.TO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 15.40%
• 1Y: 57.31%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 15.48%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

DFN.TO

DFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
DFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSA.TO	DFN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	3.16	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	3.96	-0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.68	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.90	4.93	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.65	23.37	-3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is comparable to the DFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSA.TO and DFN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSA.TO	DFN.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	3.16	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.02	0.31	+2.71

Correlation

The correlation between CLSA.TO and DFN.TO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CLSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, less than DFN.TO's 15.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	10.32%	7.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFN.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp.	15.09%	16.06%	17.92%	14.87%	15.94%	15.00%	11.83%	13.99%	15.54%	12.00%	11.17%	11.76%

Drawdowns

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum DFN.TO drawdown of -73.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSA.TO and DFN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSA.TO	DFN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.73%	-73.88%	+62.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.78%	-11.45%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.62%	-7.12%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-11.58%	+10.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	2.42%	+0.27%

Volatility

CLSA.TO vs. DFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) is 9.01%, while Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that CLSA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSA.TO	DFN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.01%	11.02%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	14.59%	-2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	18.21%	-1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.01%	25.92%	-8.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.01%	30.31%	-13.30%