PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLPAX vs. KNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLPAX achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than KNGLX's 4.69% return.


CLPAX

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.52%
YTD
14.92%
6M
13.08%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
8.41%

KNGLX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.53%
YTD
4.69%
6M
4.22%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
14.92%12.32%11.42%35.92%-30.54%13.11%5.25%19.41%-3.65%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
4.69%6.43%2.91%6.46%-7.29%23.23%7.08%26.58%-4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CLPAX and KNGLX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between CLPAX and KNGLX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLPAX vs. KNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLPAX
CLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGLX
KNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLPAXKNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.18

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.29

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

3.40

+2.51

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the KNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLPAX and KNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLPAX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, roughly equal to the maximum KNGLX drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPAX and KNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLPAXKNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.47%

-31.48%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-8.90%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-14.79%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.47%

-18.25%

-14.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-3.70%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-4.62%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

3.37%

+1.28%

Volatility

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) at 3.15%. This indicates that CLPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLPAXKNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

3.15%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

7.89%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

10.86%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

14.01%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

17.12%

-2.54%

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLPAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGLX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLPAX vs. KNGLX - Dividend Comparison

CLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, less than KNGLX's 12.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
7.92%9.10%0.00%0.00%2.68%0.32%0.49%5.41%0.30%0.02%0.00%17.26%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
12.51%8.02%9.60%7.99%4.54%4.41%3.53%4.53%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLPAX and KNGLX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLPAX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to KNGLX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLPAX dropped -32.47% vs KNGLX's -31.48%.

CLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLPAX and KNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer