CLOZ vs. EIC
CLOZ (Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF) is CLO fund actively managed by Eldridge, while EIC (Eagle Point Income Company Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CLOZ returned 9.07%/yr vs 5.23%/yr for EIC. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CLOZ vs. EIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than EIC's -3.30% return.
CLOZ
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 6.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.21%
EIC
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 1Y
- -8.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.19M | $11.37M | $8.55M | |
| $949.58K | $1.05M | $1.01M |
CLOZ vs. EIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF | 3.25% | 5.99% | 11.85% | 14.99% |
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | -3.30% | -15.28% | 24.02% | 13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOZ and EIC is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOZ vs. EIC — Risk / Return Rank
CLOZ
EIC
CLOZ vs. EIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOZ | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.92 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | -0.36 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | -0.63 | +5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOZ vs. EIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum EIC drawdown of -67.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and EIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOZ | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -67.08% | +61.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -28.67% | +24.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.32% | -34.06% | +28.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -23.49% | +23.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -12.50% | +12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 16.57% | -15.40% |
Volatility
CLOZ vs. EIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) is 0.69%, while Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that CLOZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOZ | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 4.52% | -3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 14.03% | -10.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 19.14% | -15.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 20.29% | -16.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 37.12% | -33.37% |
Dividends
CLOZ vs. EIC - Dividend Comparison
CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, less than EIC's 16.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF | 7.30% | 7.63% | 9.09% | 8.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | 16.96% | 17.35% | 15.44% | 13.59% | 11.03% | 7.78% | 10.39% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOZ and EIC have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIC has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to CLOZ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOZ dropped -5.32% vs EIC's -67.08%.
CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOZ and EIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer