PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE).

CLOD.DE and EQQQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLOD.DE is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Feb 10, 2025. EQQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002.

Performance

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
CLOD.DE
Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist		0.61%1.72%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		-4.33%3.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD.DE achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.DE's -4.33% return.

CLOD.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EQQQ.DE

1D
2.50%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-4.33%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
18.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with CLOD.DE:
CLOD.DE vs. SPPC.DECLOD.DE vs. EAAA.DECLOD.DE vs. EUCL.DECLOD.DE vs. JCL0.DECLOD.DE vs. CLOA.DECLOD.DE vs. JAAE.DECLOD.DE vs. LAAA.DE
Often compared with EQQQ.DE:
EQQQ.DE vs. CNDX.LEQQQ.DE vs. QQQEQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DEEQQQ.DE vs. IUIT.LEQQQ.DE vs. EQQB.DEEQQQ.DE vs. EQAC.MIEQQQ.DE vs. VGT

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
CLOD.DE
Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CLOD.DE
CLOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE
EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CLOD.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

0.78

+0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.19

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.16

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.56

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.26

4.59

+6.67

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD.DE and EQQQ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CLOD.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.78

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.67

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.94

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.75

+0.84

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD.DE and EQQQ.DE is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CLOD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than EQQQ.DE's 0.29% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOD.DE
Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist		2.56%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.29%0.29%0.37%0.39%0.57%0.25%0.41%0.54%0.64%0.68%0.78%0.73%

Drawdowns

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD.DE drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD.DE and EQQQ.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CLOD.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-47.04%

+46.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-13.37%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-31.30%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-7.68%

+7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-7.40%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

3.42%

-3.21%

Volatility

CLOD.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) is 0.38%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that CLOD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CLOD.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

5.03%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

11.86%

-10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

20.58%

-19.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.30%

19.86%

-18.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.30%

19.68%

-18.38%