PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD.DE achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than BNXG.DE's 25.60% return.


CLOD.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNXG.DE

1D
-2.38%
1M
9.75%
YTD
25.60%
6M
16.57%
1Y
57.31%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLOD.DE and BNXG.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD.DE
CLOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BNXG.DE
BNXG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOD.DEBNXG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.92

1.24

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.97

1.92

+8.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.80

3.89

+31.91

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD.DE and BNXG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOD.DEBNXG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

1.43

+2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.85

0.66

+2.19

Drawdowns

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD.DE drawdown since its inception was -0.62%, smaller than the maximum BNXG.DE drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD.DE and BNXG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOD.DEBNXG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-57.23%

+56.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.34%

-29.72%

+29.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.77%

+4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-21.04%

+20.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

14.69%

-14.60%

Volatility

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) is 0.30%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that CLOD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNXG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOD.DEBNXG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

9.95%

-9.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.71%

25.00%

-24.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98%

39.88%

-38.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.07%

36.22%

-35.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.07%

35.37%

-34.30%

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BNXG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOD.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Dividend Comparison

CLOD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while BNXG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLOD.DE and BNXG.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLOD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLOD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BNXG.DE.

CLOD.DE is categorized as CLO, while BNXG.DE is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CLOD.DE and 0.65% for BNXG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOD.DE and BNXG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer