CLOC vs. AAAD
CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) and AAAD (PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. CLOC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AAAD.
Performance
CLOC vs. AAAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOC vs. AAAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 0.52% |
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOC and AAAD is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOC vs. AAAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC) and PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF (AAAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOC vs. AAAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOC drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum AAAD drawdown of -0.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOC and AAAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOC | AAAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -0.96% | +0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.86% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.29% | +0.23% |
Volatility
CLOC vs. AAAD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOC | AAAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87% | 3.72% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 3.72% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 3.72% | -2.85% |
CLOC vs. AAAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAD's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOC vs. AAAD - Dividend Comparison
CLOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than AAAD's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF | 0.03% | 0.00% |
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 4.19% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOC and AAAD have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAAD is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAAD is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.
CLOC has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.03% for AAAD.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CLOC and 0.19% for AAAD.
Find the right allocation for CLOC and AAAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer