PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLO6.L vs. URND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLO6.L is traded in GBP, while URND.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URND.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLO6.L achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than URND.L's 18.39% return.


CLO6.L

1D
1.79%
1M
13.77%
YTD
10.85%
6M
9.37%
1Y
9.05%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
10Y*

URND.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
-7.57%
YTD
18.39%
6M
6.04%
1Y
65.85%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CLO6.L
Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF
10.85%-12.30%7.37%36.74%-6.85%
URND.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing
18.39%47.21%5.10%25.90%-8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CLO6.L and URND.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022

0.31

The correlation between CLO6.L and URND.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLO6.L vs. URND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLO6.L
CLO6.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CLO6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

URND.L
URND.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
URND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
URND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
URND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
URND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLO6.LURND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.15

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

5.07

-4.31

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLO6.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the URND.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLO6.L and URND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLO6.LURND.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

1.32

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.58

-0.74

Drawdowns

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLO6.L drawdown since its inception was -45.50%, which is greater than URND.L's maximum drawdown of -40.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLO6.L and URND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLO6.LURND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.50%

-40.43%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.75%

-30.45%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.31%

-40.43%

+3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.62%

-14.60%

-5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.99%

-12.69%

-18.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.89%

12.94%

-1.05%

Volatility

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) is 11.40%, while Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that CLO6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLO6.LURND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

14.63%

-3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.80%

33.57%

-8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.17%

49.84%

-21.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.55%

39.85%

-11.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.55%

39.85%

-11.30%

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLO6.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than URND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLO6.L vs. URND.L - Dividend Comparison

CLO6.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLO6.L
Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URND.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.17%0.00%1.19%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLO6.L and URND.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLO6.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLO6.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URND.L.

CLO6.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while URND.L is Commodity Producers Equities. CLO6.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while URND.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CLO6.L and 0.65% for URND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLO6.L and URND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer