PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLO6.L achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than ESIT.L's 51.37% return.


CLO6.L

1D
1.79%
1M
13.77%
YTD
10.85%
6M
9.37%
1Y
9.05%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
10Y*

ESIT.L

1D
0.18%
1M
20.73%
YTD
51.37%
6M
48.42%
1Y
65.95%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLO6.L
Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF
10.85%-12.30%7.37%36.74%-34.03%-14.62%
ESIT.L
iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
51.37%14.83%2.77%32.26%-24.43%-4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CLO6.L and ESIT.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2021

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between CLO6.L and ESIT.L has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLO6.L
CLO6.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CLO6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLO6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIT.L
ESIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLO6.LESIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

5.60

-5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

14.10

-13.34

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLO6.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLO6.L and ESIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLO6.LESIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

2.68

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.72

-0.88

Drawdowns

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLO6.L drawdown since its inception was -45.50%, which is greater than ESIT.L's maximum drawdown of -37.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLO6.L and ESIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLO6.LESIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.50%

-37.50%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.75%

-11.71%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.31%

-24.87%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.62%

-0.16%

-19.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.99%

-11.52%

-19.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.89%

4.66%

+7.23%

Volatility

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) at 9.42%. This indicates that CLO6.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLO6.LESIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

9.42%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.80%

19.85%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.17%

24.48%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.55%

25.01%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.55%

24.64%

+3.91%

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLO6.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIT.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLO6.L vs. ESIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLO6.L nor ESIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLO6.L and ESIT.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CLO6.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CLO6.L and 0.18% for ESIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLO6.L and ESIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer