CLLNY vs. HNGKY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY) and Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY).

Performance

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY) and Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLLNY Cellnex Telecom S.A	0.94%	2.87%	-20.49%	19.20%	-42.80%	-3.69%	42.06%	69.71%
HNGKY Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR	18.28%	68.39%	28.96%	-19.34%	-1.94%	26.39%	-22.92%	-14.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLLNY : $43.61B HNGKY : $88.21B
EPS CLLNY : -$0.16 HNGKY : -$0.06
PS Ratio CLLNY : 8.20 HNGKY : 25.48
PB Ratio CLLNY : 3.60 HNGKY : 2.86
Total Revenue (TTM) CLLNY : $4.47B HNGKY : $3.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLLNY : $3.01B HNGKY : $1.30B
EBITDA (TTM) CLLNY : $3.00B HNGKY : $2.19B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLLNY achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than HNGKY's 18.28% return.

CLLNY

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -14.62%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 6M: -5.38%
• 1Y: -10.32%
• 3Y*: -5.71%
• 5Y*: -9.41%
• 10Y*: —

HNGKY

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 18.28%
• 6M: 28.05%
• 1Y: 77.21%
• 3Y*: 29.01%
• 5Y*: 16.36%
• 10Y*: 7.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLLNY vs. HNGKY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLLNY

CLLNY Risk / Return Rank: 26
CLLNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CLLNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CLLNY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CLLNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CLLNY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

HNGKY

HNGKY Risk / Return Rank: 87
HNGKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HNGKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
HNGKY Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HNGKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HNGKY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY) and Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLLNY	HNGKY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	1.73	-2.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	2.32	-2.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.29	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	5.75	-6.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	13.85	-14.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLLNY Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the HNGKY Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLLNY and HNGKY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLLNY	HNGKY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	1.73	-2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.43	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.18	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between CLLNY and HNGKY is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Dividend Comparison

CLLNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than HNGKY's 3.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CLLNY Cellnex Telecom S.A	0.05%	0.05%	0.17%	0.13%	0.16%	3.89%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HNGKY Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR	3.10%	3.30%	5.06%	6.10%	5.78%	4.18%	5.05%	3.52%	3.02%	2.58%	2.64%

Drawdowns

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLLNY drawdown since its inception was -64.29%, which is greater than HNGKY's maximum drawdown of -52.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLLNY and HNGKY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLLNY	HNGKY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.29%	-52.89%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.15%	-13.26%	-16.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.07%	-43.48%	-18.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.01%	-7.28%	-50.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.04%	-19.07%	-22.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.72%	6.70%	+10.02%

Volatility

CLLNY vs. HNGKY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY) is 12.21%, while Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY) has a volatility of 13.77%. This indicates that CLLNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNGKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLLNY	HNGKY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.21%	13.77%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.45%	27.14%	-5.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.26%	45.65%	-16.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.36%	38.09%	-5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.54%	32.68%	+10.86%

Financials