PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLFFX vs. VMVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clifford Capital Partners Fund (CLFFX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLFFX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than VMVAX's 10.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CLFFX having a 10.94% annualized return and VMVAX not far behind at 10.56%.


CLFFX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.96%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.44%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
10.94%

VMVAX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.53%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.78%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLFFX
Clifford Capital Partners Fund
10.35%18.10%9.08%4.68%-4.08%19.72%10.51%23.74%-9.25%10.63%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
10.95%12.06%13.63%10.12%-7.89%28.77%2.45%28.03%-12.44%17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CLFFX and VMVAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.85

The correlation between CLFFX and VMVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLFFX vs. VMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLFFX
CLFFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CLFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CLFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVAX
VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clifford Capital Partners Fund (CLFFX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLFFXVMVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.44

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

13.13

-2.73

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the VMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLFFX and VMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLFFXVMVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.10

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.56

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.70

-0.14

Drawdowns

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLFFX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, smaller than the maximum VMVAX drawdown of -43.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLFFX and VMVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLFFXVMVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-43.07%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-6.95%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-18.40%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.36%

-19.75%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-43.07%

+2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-4.37%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.82%

+0.81%

Volatility

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Clifford Capital Partners Fund (CLFFX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) at 2.65%. This indicates that CLFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLFFXVMVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.65%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

8.17%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

11.41%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

16.02%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

18.79%

+0.67%

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLFFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLFFX vs. VMVAX - Dividend Comparison

CLFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than VMVAX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLFFX
Clifford Capital Partners Fund
1.17%1.29%1.21%4.93%1.99%4.30%2.08%1.59%5.70%5.09%0.41%0.00%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.87%2.10%2.11%2.26%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.08%2.75%1.86%1.91%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLFFX and VMVAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLFFX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VMVAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLFFX dropped -40.20% vs VMVAX's -43.07%.

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLFFX and VMVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer