CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO
CLF.TO (iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - CLF.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. CLF.TO is passively managed, while XEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLF.TO returned 1.74%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLF.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.
Performance
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 13.22% return.
CLF.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- —
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 0.91% | 3.36% | 4.82% | 4.58% | -3.98% | -1.27% | 5.53% | 0.01% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 13.22% | 19.47% | 24.36% | 17.25% | -11.01% | 18.94% | 11.82% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, CLF.TO and XEQT.TO have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLF.TO
XEQT.TO
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLF.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.70 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 16.13 | -10.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLF.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.62 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.96 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.91%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF.TO and XEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLF.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -29.74% | +22.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | -8.25% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.42% | -15.08% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.80% | -19.56% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -4.11% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 1.89% | -1.41% |
Volatility
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) is 0.72%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that CLF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLF.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 3.70% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 9.41% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04% | 11.65% | -9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 13.13% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.37% | 15.56% | -12.19% |
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLF.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CLF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.22% | 2.22% | 2.23% | 2.10% | 1.98% | 2.81% | 3.93% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 3.12% | 3.29% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.47% | 1.66% | 2.01% | 2.07% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLF.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLF.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLF.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
CLF.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for CLF.TO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for CLF.TO and XEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer