PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLF.TO vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLF.TO is traded in CAD, while FXAIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXAIX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLF.TO achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF.TO has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 1.60%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.


CLF.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.19%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
1.60%

FXAIX

1D
1.70%
1M
1.53%
YTD
10.59%
6M
10.29%
1Y
28.41%
3Y*
22.88%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
1.00%3.36%4.82%4.58%-3.98%-1.27%4.82%2.47%1.68%-0.49%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
10.59%12.46%35.60%23.29%-12.95%28.64%15.61%26.06%3.61%13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CLF.TO and FXAIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

-0.09

The correlation between CLF.TO and FXAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLF.TO
CLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLF.TOFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.01

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

11.29

-5.42

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLF.TO and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.91%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF.TO and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLF.TOFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-27.78%

+20.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-8.94%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-19.39%

+17.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.80%

-22.57%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.91%

-27.78%

+20.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-2.11%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-3.41%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

2.38%

-1.90%

Volatility

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) is 0.67%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CLF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLF.TOFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

4.58%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

10.08%

-8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

12.77%

-10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

17.96%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

19.16%

-15.80%

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLF.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CLF.TO vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

CLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than FXAIX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
2.25%2.22%2.22%2.23%2.10%1.98%2.15%2.46%2.67%2.91%3.12%3.29%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLF.TO and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLF.TO and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer