PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLDX vs. UFPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLDX vs. UFPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLDX achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly higher than UFPT's 5.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDX has underperformed UFPT with an annualized return of -6.50%, while UFPT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.21% annualized return.


CLDX

1D
3.02%
1M
8.72%
YTD
23.01%
6M
22.52%
1Y
62.98%
3Y*
-1.99%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
-6.50%

UFPT

1D
-2.50%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.08%
6M
1.58%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
31.89%
10Y*
27.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDX vs. UFPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLDX
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
23.01%7.48%-36.28%-11.02%15.35%120.55%685.65%-24.88%-93.03%-19.77%
UFPT
UFP Technologies, Inc.
5.08%-9.19%42.12%45.93%67.79%50.77%-6.07%65.15%8.06%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDX and UFPT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2008

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLDX:

$2.22B

UFPT:

$1.82B

EPS

CLDX:

-$4.27

UFPT:

$8.81

PS Ratio

CLDX:

2.71K

UFPT:

2.98

PB Ratio

CLDX:

4.87

UFPT:

4.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLDX:

$820.00K

UFPT:

$608.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLDX:

$805.00K

UFPT:

$172.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLDX:

-$216.32M

UFPT:

$111.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLDX vs. UFPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDX
CLDX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UFPT
UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDX vs. UFPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLDXUFPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

-0.02

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

-0.03

+6.79

CLDX vs. UFPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the UFPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDX and UFPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLDX vs. UFPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDX drawdown since its inception was -99.73%, which is greater than UFPT's maximum drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDX and UFPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLDXUFPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.73%

-88.53%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.23%

-30.69%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.84%

-48.31%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.11%

-48.31%

-24.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.90%

-48.31%

-49.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.11%

-34.91%

-59.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.04%

-32.24%

-45.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.35%

16.94%

-7.59%

Volatility

CLDX vs. UFPT - Volatility Comparison

Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX) has a higher volatility of 11.62% compared to UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) at 8.94%. This indicates that CLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLDXUFPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.62%

8.94%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.03%

30.66%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.82%

43.80%

+13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.21%

44.31%

+14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.95%

39.59%

+38.36%

Dividends

CLDX vs. UFPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLDX nor UFPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLDX vs. UFPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
15.00K
154.20M
(CLDX) Total Revenue
(UFPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLDX and UFPT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLDX has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to UFPT (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDX dropped -99.73% vs UFPT's -88.53%.

CLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLDX and UFPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer