CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CL0U.DE (Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CL0U.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CL0U.DE returned 7.04%/yr vs 62.06%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CL0U.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.

Performance

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CL0U.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL0U.DE achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.

CL0U.DE

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 13.48%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 5.95%
• 3Y*: 7.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSMC.DE

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 16.45%
• YTD: 63.83%
• 6M: 64.57%
• 1Y: 130.64%
• 3Y*: 62.06%
• 5Y*: 36.20%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CL0U.DE Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF	11.61%	-16.03%	11.50%	40.13%	-36.85%	-11.22%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	63.83%	32.60%	66.54%	74.46%	-34.66%	5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021	0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL0U.DE

CL0U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 12
CL0U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
CL0U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CL0U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CL0U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CL0U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 12

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CL0U.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CL0U.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	4.27	-4.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	4.60	-4.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.59	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	10.37	-10.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.51	32.83	-32.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL0U.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CL0U.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	4.27	-4.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	0.82	-0.96

Drawdowns

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL0U.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.57%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CL0U.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.57%	-39.77%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.28%	-12.53%	-14.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.10%	-36.22%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.30%	-3.34%	-16.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-9.37%	-21.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.66%	3.96%	+7.70%

Volatility

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CL0U.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) have volatilities of 11.61% and 11.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CL0U.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.61%	11.23%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.33%	22.18%	+3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.28%	30.40%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.45%	31.21%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.45%	26.06%	+3.39%

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CL0U.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CL0U.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CL0U.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE in my portfolio?

CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CL0U.DE or LSMC.DE?

On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CL0U.DE or LSMC.DE?

LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CL0U.DE.

What is the main difference between CL0U.DE and LSMC.DE?

CL0U.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. CL0U.DE tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CL0U.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.