PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CJPU.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CJPU.L achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CJPU.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 9.05%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.


CJPU.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
-1.47%
6M
9.41%
YTD
15.49%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
9.05%

SGLN.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
-6.59%
6M
-12.14%
YTD
-5.86%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CJPU.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
15.49%26.13%7.33%20.25%-17.32%0.50%16.08%17.64%-13.50%24.10%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-5.86%65.25%26.06%12.89%-0.12%-3.71%23.60%19.23%-1.55%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CJPU.L and SGLN.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.07

Over the past year, CJPU.L and SGLN.L have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CJPU.L
CJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CJPU.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.89

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

2.17

+6.85

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CJPU.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.64%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -56.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJPU.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CJPU.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.64%

-56.74%

+24.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-24.59%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-24.59%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-24.59%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.64%

-24.59%

-8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-23.60%

+19.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-32.94%

+27.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

10.09%

-6.17%

Volatility

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) have volatilities of 6.79% and 6.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CJPU.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

6.98%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

22.13%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.69%

25.64%

-3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

22.88%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

18.87%

-1.77%

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CJPU.L and SGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CJPU.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CJPU.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CJPU.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CJPU.L and SGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

CJPU.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net), while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CJPU.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer