CJPU.L vs. N400.L
CJPU.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and N400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds - CJPU.L tracks the MSCI Japan Index (Net) while N400.L tracks the JPX-Nikkei Index 400. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CJPU.L returned 8.85%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for N400.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CJPU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for N400.L.
Performance
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CJPU.L having a 12.44% return and N400.L slightly higher at 12.82%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CJPU.L having a 8.85% annualized return and N400.L not far ahead at 8.89%.
CJPU.L
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -5.70%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
N400.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJPU.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.44% | 26.13% | 7.33% | 20.25% | -17.32% | 0.50% | 16.08% | 17.64% | -13.50% | 24.10% |
N400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc) | 12.82% | 25.87% | 6.53% | 20.26% | -15.79% | -0.37% | 15.93% | 17.97% | -14.20% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CJPU.L and N400.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2014 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CJPU.L and N400.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CJPU.L vs. N400.L — Risk / Return Rank
CJPU.L
N400.L
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc) (N400.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CJPU.L | N400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.45 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | 8.00 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.64%, roughly equal to the maximum N400.L drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJPU.L and N400.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CJPU.L | N400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.64% | -32.66% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -11.77% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.74% | -14.55% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.64% | -32.66% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.64% | -32.66% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -5.24% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -8.10% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 3.61% | +0.33% |
Volatility
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc) (N400.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that CJPU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than N400.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CJPU.L | N400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 6.36% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.29% | 17.44% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 20.69% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 17.96% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 16.94% | +0.18% |
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CJPU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than N400.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CJPU.L vs. N400.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CJPU.L nor N400.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, CJPU.L and N400.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CJPU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CJPU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for N400.L.
CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net), while N400.L tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CJPU.L and 0.19% for N400.L.
Find the right allocation for CJPU.L and N400.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer