PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CIWP.DE
CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP
-38.89%-60.70%82.28%43.15%-35.57%
21BC.DE
21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP
-20.76%-16.55%130.13%150.78%-35.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIWP.DE achieves a -38.89% return, which is significantly lower than 21BC.DE's -20.76% return.


CIWP.DE

1D
1.70%
1M
-8.49%
YTD
-38.89%
6M
-54.64%
1Y
-47.25%
3Y*
-18.94%
5Y*
10Y*

21BC.DE

1D
2.00%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-20.76%
6M
-40.85%
1Y
-24.76%
3Y*
31.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIWP.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than 21BC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIWP.DE
CIWP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CIWP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIWP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIWP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CIWP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIWP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

21BC.DE
21BC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
21BC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIWP.DE21BC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

-0.62

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.32

-0.70

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.92

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

-0.53

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.12

-1.14

+0.01

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIWP.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is comparable to the 21BC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIWP.DE and 21BC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIWP.DE21BC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

-0.62

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.59

-0.78

Correlation

The correlation between CIWP.DE and 21BC.DE is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIWP.DE nor 21BC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIWP.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.45%, which is greater than 21BC.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIWP.DE and 21BC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CIWP.DE21BC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.45%

-49.40%

-35.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.24%

-49.40%

-23.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.40%

-44.57%

-37.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.55%

-12.91%

-33.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.79%

22.98%

+18.81%

Volatility

CIWP.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC.DE) at 13.12%. This indicates that CIWP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 21BC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CIWP.DE21BC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.06%

13.12%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.64%

32.53%

+34.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.30%

40.13%

+55.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.56%

47.00%

+48.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.56%

47.00%

+48.56%