CIVVX vs. CEMVX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CIVVX (Causeway International Value Fund) and CEMVX (Causeway Emerging Markets Investor) are both mutual funds - CIVVX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Causeway, while CEMVX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, CIVVX returned 10.80%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for CEMVX. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CIVVX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for CEMVX.

Performance

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Investor (CEMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIVVX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than CEMVX's 23.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CIVVX has outperformed CEMVX with an annualized return of 10.80%, while CEMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.

CIVVX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 3.28%
• 6M: 6.99%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 1Y: 27.71%
• 3Y*: 19.55%
• 5Y*: 13.65%
• 10Y*: 10.80%
• ALL TIME*: 8.37%

CEMVX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 11.67%
• YTD: 23.08%
• 1Y: 41.99%
• 3Y*: 25.96%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 9.93%
• ALL TIME*: 6.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CEMVX Causeway Emerging Markets Investor	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund	12.42%	38.72%	3.46%	26.99%	-6.99%	8.86%	5.16%	19.81%	-18.83%	27.09%
CEMVX Causeway Emerging Markets Investor	23.08%	35.92%	14.62%	16.83%	-23.20%	-1.10%	16.73%	16.39%	-18.06%	39.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CIVVX and CEMVX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between CIVVX and CEMVX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CIVVX vs. CEMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIVVX

CIVVX Risk / Return Rank: 52
CIVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CIVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CIVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CIVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CIVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

CEMVX

CEMVX Risk / Return Rank: 63
CEMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CEMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CEMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CEMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CEMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Investor (CEMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIVVX	CEMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.72	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.17	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.77	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	9.31	-3.41

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIVVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the CEMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIVVX and CEMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIVVX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, smaller than the maximum CEMVX drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIVVX and CEMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIVVX	CEMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.07%	-69.02%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.20%	-16.32%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.31%	-18.01%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.60%	-34.14%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.13%	-39.88%	-5.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.05%	+10.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-15.95%	+4.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	4.82%	+0.18%

Volatility

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) is 5.25%, while Causeway Emerging Markets Investor (CEMVX) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that CIVVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIVVX	CEMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	11.60%	-6.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.46%	24.20%	-8.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.93%	26.36%	-8.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	19.20%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	19.06%	+0.06%

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIVVX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMVX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIVVX vs. CEMVX - Dividend Comparison

CIVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than CEMVX's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMVX Causeway Emerging Markets Investor	1.84%	2.26%	3.45%	4.55%	4.40%	22.65%	1.18%	1.79%	1.54%	1.36%	1.30%	1.48%
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund	8.53%	9.59%	9.07%	3.39%	1.54%	1.60%	1.11%	4.41%	3.31%	1.73%	1.69%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIVVX and CEMVX in my portfolio?

CIVVX and CEMVX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIVVX or CEMVX?

CEMVX has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to CIVVX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIVVX dropped -61.07% vs CEMVX's -69.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.