CISIX vs. RESGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CISIX (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CISIX returned 15.04%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CISIX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

CISIX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISIX achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 22.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CISIX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 15.04%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.

CISIX

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 10.06%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 1Y: 22.69%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 11.44%
• 10Y*: 15.04%
• ALL TIME*: 7.69%

RESGX

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 16.73%
• YTD: 22.24%
• 1Y: 34.64%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: 12.23%
• ALL TIME*: 12.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CISIX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	11.28%	15.90%	24.14%	27.27%	-21.68%	25.63%	26.12%	32.81%	-4.08%	21.18%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	22.24%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	26.58%	9.57%	24.25%	-6.47%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CISIX and RESGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.90

The correlation between CISIX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CISIX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CISIX

CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 87
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CISIX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CISIX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.13	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.98	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	4.06	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	12.85	-3.80

CISIX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISIX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CISIX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISIX drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISIX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CISIX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.36%	-37.80%	-21.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.72%	-7.84%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.94%	-20.50%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.37%	-23.58%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.82%	-37.80%	+4.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-4.44%	+2.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-4.98%	-9.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	2.50%	-0.29%

Volatility

CISIX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CISIX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	3.62%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.82%	11.33%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	14.97%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.92%	17.31%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.57%	18.65%	-0.08%

CISIX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CISIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CISIX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

CISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than RESGX's 6.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	4.84%	5.39%	1.77%	1.02%	1.17%	1.02%	0.94%	1.14%	4.33%	2.41%	3.77%	7.62%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	6.97%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CISIX and RESGX in my portfolio?

CISIX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CISIX or RESGX?

CISIX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to RESGX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISIX dropped -59.36% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.