PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CISIX vs. CFJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISIX achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly lower than CFJIX's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CISIX has outperformed CFJIX with an annualized return of 15.63%, while CFJIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.


CISIX

1D
0.24%
1M
6.59%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.90%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.63%

CFJIX

1D
0.89%
1M
5.68%
YTD
15.07%
6M
16.33%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
13.10%15.90%24.14%27.27%-21.68%25.63%26.12%32.81%-4.08%21.18%
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
15.07%16.76%14.63%9.86%-11.70%24.40%9.06%29.36%-10.08%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CISIX and CFJIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

The correlation between CISIX and CFJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CISIX vs. CFJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CISIX
CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CFJIX
CFJIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CFJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CFJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CISIXCFJIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.44

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

13.35

+1.43

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the CFJIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISIX and CFJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CISIXCFJIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.44

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.59

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.66

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.67

-0.28

Drawdowns

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISIX drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than CFJIX's maximum drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISIX and CFJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CISIXCFJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-36.91%

-22.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-9.00%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-16.60%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.37%

-22.62%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-36.91%

+4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-5.10%

-9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.31%

-0.20%

Volatility

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) is 3.33%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that CISIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CISIXCFJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.91%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

9.60%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

12.70%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

15.97%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

17.99%

+0.58%

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CISIX and CFJIX have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CISIX vs. CFJIX - Dividend Comparison

CISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than CFJIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
7.96%9.16%6.31%2.07%2.02%4.17%1.88%2.17%4.87%6.79%2.28%0.00%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
4.77%5.39%1.77%1.02%1.17%1.02%0.94%1.14%4.33%2.41%3.77%7.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CISIX and CFJIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFJIX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to CISIX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISIX dropped -59.36% vs CFJIX's -36.91%.

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CISIX and CFJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer