CIPSX vs. NESIX
CIPSX (Champlain Small Company Fund) and NESIX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CIPSX returned -1.90%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for NESIX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIPSX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for NESIX.
Performance
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPSX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 76.59% return.
CIPSX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- -18.68%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
NESIX
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 76.59%
- 6M
- 72.42%
- 1Y
- 107.12%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 4.39% | -22.88% | 23.09% | 14.01% | -20.83% | 12.37% | 24.14% | 25.02% | -3.35% | 10.56% |
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional | 76.59% | 11.16% | 13.47% | 5.85% | -29.71% | 11.36% | 73.06% | 55.28% | -4.87% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPSX and NESIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CIPSX and NESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPSX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIPSX
NESIX
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIPSX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.52 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 6.66 | -7.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 27.09 | -28.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPSX drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, smaller than the maximum NESIX drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPSX and NESIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPSX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -49.61% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.56% | -17.12% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.27% | -35.21% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.62% | -49.61% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.58% | -4.35% | -18.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -14.92% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.38% | 4.20% | +13.18% |
Volatility
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) is 5.06%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that CIPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPSX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 12.86% | -7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 22.69% | -9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 31.59% | -5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 29.64% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 26.59% | -4.77% |
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPSX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPSX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIPSX nor NESIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.74% | 6.39% | 0.36% | 4.45% | 6.11% | 7.96% | 13.29% | 9.78% | 2.72% | 2.67% |
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.93% | 23.92% | 13.26% | 8.25% | 21.96% | 8.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPSX and NESIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NESIX has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to CIPSX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPSX dropped -46.42% vs NESIX's -49.61%.
NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPSX and NESIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer