CINT vs. PLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CINT (CI&T Inc.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, CINT returned -8.03%/yr vs 113.95%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CINT vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CI&T Inc. (CINT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINT achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -20.00% return.

CINT

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -2.75%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -18.79%
• 1Y: -35.81%
• 3Y*: -8.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTR

• 1D: -6.55%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -20.00%
• 6M: -19.24%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 113.95%
• 5Y*: 42.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CINT vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CINT CI&T Inc.	-4.42%	-32.95%	15.40%	-19.08%	-45.33%	-34.38%
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	-20.00%	135.03%	340.48%	167.45%	-64.74%	-19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CINT and PLTR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap CINT : $507.24M PLTR : $365.59B
EPS CINT : $0.60 PLTR : $0.89
PE Ratio CINT : 6.47 PLTR : 160.02
PS Ratio CINT : 0.48 PLTR : 69.88
PB Ratio CINT : 1.59 PLTR : 43.27
Total Revenue (TTM) CINT : $1.07B PLTR : $5.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) CINT : $331.71M PLTR : $4.39B
EBITDA (TTM) CINT : $163.40M PLTR : $2.01B

Return for Risk

CINT vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINT

CINT Risk / Return Rank: 10
CINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CINT Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CINT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

PLTR

PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 43
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CINT vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI&T Inc. (CINT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CINT	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	0.13	-0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	0.53	-1.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.07	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	0.18	-0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.63	0.33	-1.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CINT vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINT Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINT and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CINT	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.75	0.13	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.45	0.88	-1.33

Drawdowns

CINT vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINT drawdown since its inception was -83.83%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINT and PLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CINT	PLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.83%	-84.62%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.88%	-38.19%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.72%	-40.61%	-17.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-79.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.53%	-31.36%	-49.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.64%	-40.31%	-24.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.95%	20.40%	+1.55%

Volatility

CINT vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

CI&T Inc. (CINT) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 18.39%. This indicates that CINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CINT	PLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.41%	18.39%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.11%	38.32%	-0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.96%	51.70%	-3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.23%	65.41%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.23%	69.86%	-5.63%

Dividends

CINT vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CINT nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CINT vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CI&T Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CINT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CI&T Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.75M and revenue of 136.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

CINT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CI&T Inc. reported an operating income of 13.71M and revenue of 136.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

CINT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CI&T Inc. reported a net income of 7.56M and revenue of 136.61M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CINT and PLTR in my portfolio?

CINT and PLTR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CINT or PLTR?

CINT has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to PLTR (18.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINT dropped -83.83% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.