CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO
CINT.TO (CIBC International Equity ETF) and CGLO.TO (CIBC Global Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CINT.TO is a International Equity fund actively managed by CIBC, while CGLO.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by CIBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CINT.TO returned 2.60%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for CGLO.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CINT.TO having a 5.69% return and CGLO.TO slightly higher at 5.72%.
CINT.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CGLO.TO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINT.TO CIBC International Equity ETF | 5.69% | 2.86% | 6.50% | 15.15% | -18.71% | 11.57% | 8.40% |
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 5.72% | 4.24% | 17.98% | 18.74% | -14.90% | 17.27% | 9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINT.TO and CGLO.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between CINT.TO and CGLO.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CINT.TO
CGLO.TO
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC International Equity ETF (CINT.TO) and CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINT.TO | CGLO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.13 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.87 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 2.57 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, which is greater than CGLO.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINT.TO and CGLO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINT.TO | CGLO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.69% | -25.07% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -11.46% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -17.51% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.69% | -25.07% | -4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -2.93% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -5.38% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 3.88% | +0.14% |
Volatility
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC International Equity ETF (CINT.TO) and CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINT.TO | CGLO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 5.33% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 11.45% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 13.73% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 14.52% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 14.24% | +0.50% |
Dividends
CINT.TO vs. CGLO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CINT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than CGLO.TO's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.13% | 0.77% |
CINT.TO CIBC International Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CINT.TO and CGLO.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CINT.TO is categorized as International Equity, while CGLO.TO is Global Equities.
Find the right allocation for CINT.TO and CGLO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer