PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CII vs. CSWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CII vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly higher than CSWC's 11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CII has underperformed CSWC with an annualized return of 15.39%, while CSWC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.


CII

1D
-0.78%
1M
5.40%
YTD
12.40%
6M
12.39%
1Y
47.06%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
15.39%

CSWC

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
11.42%
6M
17.36%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CII vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
12.40%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
11.42%14.28%2.14%56.10%-24.63%57.40%-1.56%22.80%29.52%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CII and CSWC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2004

0.31

The correlation between CII and CSWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CII vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CII vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIICSWCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.15

1.63

+1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

2.36

+1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.29

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.87

+2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.55

6.08

+10.47

CII vs. CSWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CII Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the CSWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CII and CSWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIICSWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

1.63

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.41

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.63

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

CII vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum CSWC drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and CSWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIICSWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.43%

-68.33%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-15.75%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-27.74%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-33.66%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-61.15%

+20.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-2.09%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-18.37%

+12.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

4.86%

-2.02%

Volatility

CII vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) is 4.44%, while Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that CII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIICSWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

5.00%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

13.87%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01%

18.83%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

22.64%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

27.39%

-8.87%

Dividends

CII vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison

CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.27%, more than CSWC's 12.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
15.27%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
12.49%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CII and CSWC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSWC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to CII (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CII dropped -56.43% vs CSWC's -68.33%.

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CII and CSWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer