PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIHKY vs. USCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIHKY vs. USCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (CIHKY) and USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIHKY achieves a -8.24% return, which is significantly lower than USCB's -0.82% return.


CIHKY

1D
-1.62%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-6.67%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
-3.32%
10Y*
16.95%

USCB

1D
-2.86%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
0.11%
1Y
12.60%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIHKY vs. USCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co Ltd
-8.24%39.35%54.40%-33.54%-26.03%-3.64%
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
-0.82%6.13%47.03%0.41%-12.89%29.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CIHKY and USCB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIHKY:

$154.05B

USCB:

$332.73M

EPS

CIHKY:

$29.47

USCB:

$1.45

PE Ratio

CIHKY:

1.03

USCB:

12.46

PEG Ratio

CIHKY:

0.18

USCB:

0.27

PS Ratio

CIHKY:

0.33

USCB:

2.46

PB Ratio

CIHKY:

0.12

USCB:

1.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIHKY:

$462.43B

USCB:

$140.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIHKY:

$323.77B

USCB:

$91.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIHKY:

$176.26B

USCB:

$37.81M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


China Merchants Bank Co Ltd

USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

Often compared with CIHKY:
CIHKY vs. OVCHYCIHKY vs. BNP.PA
Often compared with USCB:
USCB vs. NECBUSCB vs. C

Return for Risk

CIHKY vs. USCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIHKY
CIHKY Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CIHKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIHKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIHKY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CIHKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIHKY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

USCB
USCB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
USCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIHKY vs. USCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (CIHKY) and USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIHKYUSCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.10

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.93

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

1.87

-1.57

CIHKY vs. USCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIHKY Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the USCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIHKY and USCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIHKYUSCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

0.43

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.33

-0.05

Drawdowns

CIHKY vs. USCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIHKY drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than USCB's maximum drawdown of -44.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIHKY and USCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIHKYUSCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.69%

-44.24%

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.33%

-13.61%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.96%

-23.22%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.25%

-11.74%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-17.39%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

6.74%

+1.06%

Volatility

CIHKY vs. USCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (CIHKY) is 4.48%, while USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that CIHKY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIHKYUSCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

6.52%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

20.16%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

29.14%

-7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.32%

36.98%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.79%

36.98%

-1.19%

Dividends

CIHKY vs. USCB - Dividend Comparison

CIHKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than USCB's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co Ltd
6.97%4.11%5.38%7.03%4.13%2.53%2.26%2.19%3.03%5.12%8.93%3.76%
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.50%2.17%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CIHKY vs. USCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Merchants Bank Co Ltd and USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
117.41B
26.20M
(CIHKY) Total Revenue
(USCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CIHKY vs. USCB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Merchants Bank Co Ltd and USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
74.1%
96.9%
Portfolio components
CIHKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Merchants Bank Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 86.94B and revenue of 117.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

USCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.40M and revenue of 26.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.9%.

CIHKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Merchants Bank Co Ltd reported an operating income of 44.68B and revenue of 117.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.1%.

USCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.69M and revenue of 26.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.6%.

CIHKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Merchants Bank Co Ltd reported a net income of 37.85B and revenue of 117.41B, resulting in a net margin of 32.2%.

USCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 9.35M and revenue of 26.20M, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIHKY and USCB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCB has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to CIHKY (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIHKY dropped -62.69% vs USCB's -44.24%.

USCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIHKY and USCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer