CIHIX vs. CEMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cullen International High Dividend Fund (CIHIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX).
CIHIX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Dec 14, 2005. CEMFX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIHIX Cullen International High Dividend Fund | 2.88% | 29.49% | 4.12% | 17.81% | -11.99% | 11.24% | 3.07% | 21.30% | -15.62% | 17.99% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 6.79% | 31.39% | 9.51% | 26.45% | -16.15% | 6.74% | 8.70% | 19.75% | -16.90% | 29.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIHIX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CIHIX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.
CIHIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
CEMFX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -11.79%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIHIX and CEMFX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.
Return for Risk
CIHIX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank
CIHIX
CEMFX
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen International High Dividend Fund (CIHIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIHIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 2.25 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 2.86 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.43 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.87 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 10.73 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIHIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 2.25 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIHIX and CEMFX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison
CIHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than CEMFX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIHIX Cullen International High Dividend Fund | 3.98% | 3.18% | 5.22% | 4.04% | 1.16% | 3.01% | 2.22% | 3.54% | 3.13% | 3.35% | 3.09% | 2.93% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 2.03% | 1.72% | 3.31% | 4.68% | 1.26% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 4.16% | 2.26% | 3.59% | 3.65% | 4.60% |
Drawdowns
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIHIX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIHIX and CEMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIHIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -39.30% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -12.41% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.10% | -28.13% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.18% | -39.30% | +5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -12.41% | +3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.65% | -9.69% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.33% | -0.49% |
Volatility
CIHIX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cullen International High Dividend Fund (CIHIX) is 5.30%, while Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that CIHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIHIX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 6.95% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 12.42% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 16.42% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 14.09% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 14.92% | -0.51% |