CIGEX vs. GAOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX).
CIGEX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Feb 28, 2007. GAOAX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 31, 2011.
Performance
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGEX Calamos Global Equity Fund | -5.78% | 18.46% | 30.61% | 24.55% | -27.42% | 16.61% | 44.24% | 29.43% | -15.54% | 34.56% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | -5.28% | 14.68% | 7.91% | 12.69% | -18.74% | 3.60% | 15.29% | 15.95% | -6.07% | 16.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIGEX achieves a -5.78% return, which is significantly lower than GAOAX's -5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGEX has outperformed GAOAX with an annualized return of 12.93%, while GAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.
CIGEX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -12.14%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -7.10%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
GAOAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIGEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GAOAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIGEX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
CIGEX
GAOAX
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIGEX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.72 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.06 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 0.82 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 3.42 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIGEX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.72 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.16 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.52 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIGEX and GAOAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison
CIGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.31%, more than GAOAX's 10.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGEX Calamos Global Equity Fund | 16.31% | 15.37% | 8.67% | 0.10% | 4.43% | 11.75% | 6.51% | 7.44% | 27.66% | 9.21% | 4.62% | 1.98% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 10.19% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIGEX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, which is greater than GAOAX's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGEX and GAOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIGEX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -29.02% | -31.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -8.95% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.81% | -29.02% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.81% | -29.02% | -6.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.31% | -8.95% | -4.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -6.01% | -4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.15% | +1.38% |
Volatility
CIGEX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) at 4.64%. This indicates that CIGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIGEX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 4.64% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 7.42% | +7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 11.46% | +9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 11.02% | +8.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 10.80% | +8.45% |