CIEG vs. ADBG
CIEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIEN Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.48 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
CIEG vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CIEG
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -25.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ADBG
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 24.78%
- 6M
- -39.12%
- YTD
- -58.12%
- 1Y
- -61.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -59.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.29M | $27.94M | $25.65M | |
| $997.11K | $1.65M | $5.20M |
CIEG vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CIEG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIEN Daily ETF | -63.45% |
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIEG and ADBG is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIEG vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank
CIEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADBG
CIEG vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIEN Daily ETF (CIEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIEG | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIEG vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIEG drawdown since its inception was -76.08%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIEG and ADBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIEG | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.08% | -84.14% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -77.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.11% | -74.57% | +5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.02% | -45.89% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 46.03% | — |
Volatility
CIEG vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIEG | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 66.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.24% | 76.96% | +83.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.24% | 72.72% | +87.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.24% | 72.72% | +87.52% |
CIEG vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIEG and ADBG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
CIEG vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIEG nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIEG and ADBG have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIEG and ADBG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
CIEG and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for CIEG and ADBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer