CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO
CIC.TO (CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF) and SOLX.TO (CI Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIC.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by CI, while SOLX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by CI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIC.TO charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLX.TO.
Performance
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIC.TO achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than SOLX.TO's -39.87% return.
CIC.TO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 49.89%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
SOLX.TO
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -9.51%
- YTD
- -39.87%
- 6M
- -49.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 16.07% | 16.08% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | -39.87% | -40.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIC.TO and SOLX.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIC.TO
SOLX.TO
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) and CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIC.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIC.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | -1.02 | +1.71 |
Drawdowns
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.55%, smaller than the maximum SOLX.TO drawdown of -70.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIC.TO and SOLX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIC.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.55% | -70.44% | +31.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -70.44% | +68.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -47.74% | +42.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | — | — |
Volatility
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIC.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.26% | 73.25% | -61.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 73.25% | -60.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 73.25% | -56.96% |
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIC.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLX.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIC.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, while SOLX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 5.25% | 5.72% | 6.71% | 7.37% | 7.64% | 5.48% | 9.56% | 6.16% | 6.61% | 5.68% | 6.72% | 7.31% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.81% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIC.TO and SOLX.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIC.TO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
CIC.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while SOLX.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for CIC.TO and 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
Find the right allocation for CIC.TO and SOLX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer