CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO
CIC.TO (CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF) and BANK.TO (Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CIC.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by CI, while BANK.TO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Core Financials Equal Weight Index. CIC.TO is actively managed, while BANK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CIC.TO returned 26.94%/yr vs 31.96%/yr for BANK.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIC.TO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BANK.TO.
Performance
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIC.TO achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly lower than BANK.TO's 17.36% return.
CIC.TO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 49.89%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
BANK.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 55.24%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 16.07% | 36.24% | 21.30% | 6.58% | -17.13% |
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 17.36% | 41.00% | 27.90% | 16.23% | -20.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIC.TO and BANK.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CIC.TO and BANK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIC.TO
BANK.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CIC.TO
BANK.TO
Basic Materials
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Communication Services
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Energy
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Healthcare
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Industrials
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Real Estate
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Technology
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Utilities
CIC.TO
-
BANK.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIC.TO
BANK.TO
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.85 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 6.75 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.56 | 29.78 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45 | 4.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.08 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.55%, which is greater than BANK.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIC.TO and BANK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.55% | -29.03% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.23% | -8.23% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -15.49% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.16% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -8.81% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.86% | -0.11% |
Volatility
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) is 4.00%, while Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that CIC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.28% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 10.45% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.26% | 12.09% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 15.65% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 15.65% | +0.64% |
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIC.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than BANK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than BANK.TO's 13.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 13.02% | 13.73% | 15.28% | 13.60% | 10.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 5.25% | 5.72% | 6.71% | 7.37% | 7.64% | 5.48% | 9.56% | 6.16% | 6.61% | 5.68% | 6.72% | 7.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIC.TO and BANK.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BANK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BANK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for CIC.TO.
CIC.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while BANK.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CI and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for CIC.TO and 0.60% for BANK.TO.
Find the right allocation for CIC.TO and BANK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer