CIBFX vs. PFADX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX).
CIBFX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Jul 30, 1987. PFADX is managed by The Pacific Financial Group. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017.
Performance
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBFX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 | 0.14% | 20.29% | 10.16% | 8.90% | -7.21% | 14.95% | 3.14% | 17.16% | -7.10% | 0.19% |
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund | 0.82% | 7.07% | 2.13% | 3.69% | -9.50% | 3.85% | 7.25% | 8.16% | -5.20% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBFX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than PFADX's 0.82% return.
CIBFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
PFADX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PFADX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIBFX vs. PFADX — Risk / Return Rank
CIBFX
PFADX
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBFX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.75 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.56 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 5.67 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBFX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.25 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.37 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBFX and PFADX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Dividend Comparison
CIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than PFADX's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBFX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 | 7.70% | 7.65% | 5.69% | 3.41% | 3.37% | 3.08% | 3.34% | 4.04% | 3.72% | 4.37% | 3.46% | 3.56% |
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund | 2.44% | 2.46% | 2.89% | 1.04% | 5.33% | 3.46% | 0.08% | 1.51% | 0.91% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBFX drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than PFADX's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBFX and PFADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBFX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -16.64% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -4.21% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.68% | -16.64% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -3.44% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -5.38% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.16% | +0.65% |
Volatility
CIBFX vs. PFADX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) at 1.81%. This indicates that CIBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIBFX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 1.81% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.95% | 3.06% | +2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.12% | 4.95% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 5.85% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 5.55% | +5.31% |